FOOTBALL: Mark Hughes confirmed as new Fulham manager after signing two-year contract

Is the demise of KERS a warning sign for F1?

By Tom Harverson  
1:14pm UK, Tuesday June 9, 2009
By Tom Harverson, 1:14pm UK, Tuesday June 9, 2009

F1

The Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) developed to increase overtaking in Formula One is set to be scrapped next season just a year after it was introduced.

Despite KERS’ ability to provide a surge of kinetic energy that increases overtaking capabilities on the track, the Formula One Teams’ Association has agreed to chop the optional system in a move which will leave many F1 fans disappointed.

At a time when the world’s most glamorous sport is attempting to tighten its belt, the ditching of KERS appears, in part, to be an extension to the cost cutting drive of F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone and FIA boss Max Mosley.

The past few weeks have seen yet another pantomime in the paddock as some of the biggest manufacturers threatened to quit and set up a rival competition after Mosley announced that the sport would introduce an optional £40m budget cap.

After weeks of infighting, the drama finally climaxed when Ferrari lost a bid in a French court to have Mosley’s plans ruled unjust and it is widely believed that an elevated cap of around £100m could be introduced in the next few years.

But KERS, which adds weight and therefore increases fuel consumption, has been viewed as a dispensable luxury during the current economic climate and it appears that FOTA has made this decision in order to appease Mosley.

Clearly the system’s maiden season has been a flop with only McLaren, Ferrari, BMW Sauber and Renault having snapped up the new technology – of which the latter two have already cut their trial short whist Ferrari is struggling to harness its potential.

But teething problems with new technology are nothing new and arguably during a strong economic period KERS would have survived its embryonic stages to be molded into an exciting new addition that would increase the thrill of watching F1.

Therefore the question is if new and potentially exciting technology is being shunned before it has had time to be developed because of the economic downturn, will F1 lose its attraction?

F1 is a business that thrives on celebrity, glitz and glamour – hundreds of motor homes stuffed full of the world’s A-listers tearing across the planet from one incredible destination to another. But away from the celebrity world still lurks the petrol heads and the engine junkies for whom the thrill is the shriek of an engine, the smack of petrol fumes and the difference between soft and hard tyres.

The downfall of KERS is perhaps a worrying precedent that technology may take a backseat in what is becoming a scrappy dogfight as F1 looks for expendables in the sport.

If pioneering technology disappears, all that is left is a bunch of crazed celebs on a racetrack. If this continues expect race days in the future to be broadcast on E4 and hosted by Davina McCall.

Download The Sport Review's free new iPhone App here
RELATED ARTICLES
HAVE YOUR SAY — 5 Comments
  1. Scott on June 9th, 2009 at 2:51pm

    FOTA haven’t dropped KERS to appease Mosley, it’s very much his baby but never something the teams have been completely sold on. They did have an option to abandon KERS before the season got under way. All voted in favour, except BMW who vetoed dropping the system (due to marketing reasons).

    As for fans, well the majority don’t appear to be particularly passionate about the subject. After all, KERS isn’t an especially exciting example of automotive technology.

  2. Liam on June 9th, 2009 at 8:26pm

    I agree

  3. Mark on June 10th, 2009 at 12:50pm

    The biggest problem with KERS is that the extra mass compromises handling. So you get the situation that a non-KERS car is quicker (and can even overtake) a KERS car in the corners but on the next straight the car with KERS just powers away again. Not exacatley the sort of overtaking we were hoping for!

  4. Tomombo on June 13th, 2009 at 4:57am

    button is running away with it

  5. Edward on July 26th, 2009 at 9:37pm

    Im in no way a fan of KERS but you can sort of see the point of it.
    F1 is used by non-privateers as a “trial/technical” excercise to showpiece new technology that can be used in everyday road going cars i.e. traction control or in the mid 1990s active suspension. Thats why the teams that use KERS, who sell vehicles to the general public, do so and why no privateer has put money into developing it.
    During last season Honda F1 had a highly developed KERS unit but they pulled out and Brawn GP have not used it because the cost compromise to the 11% performance gain wasnt worth it on an F1 track.
    Im not saying BMW will put a KERS button in their next M5 to help you overtake the chap in front on your way to the shops, but they may use elements of the battery storage technology or the fly wheel in their future models.




Important: Any comments which contain foul language, or which are of an aggressive or abusive nature will be moderated or removed. Opinions expressed in comments on this website are those of the individual and do not represent the views of thesportreview.com.
The Sport Review - Sports News and Opinion
RSS Feed Facebook Twitter via Email