FOOTBALL: Fabio Capello resigns as England manager after holding talks with FA officials at Wembley

Who should Carlo Ancelotti sign?

By Online Editorial   

[poll id="18"]

In the latest in a series of polls on The Sport Review, we want to know what player would top Chelsea fans’ lists of transfer targets this summer.

The Blues have been linked with a host of players, ranging from a goalkeeper from Middlesborough, to a Brazilian wonderkid from AC Milan.

We want to know who would be your priority if you were in Carlo Ancelotti’s position. Have your say by casting your vote in the box above.

Related Articles
Your Comments (showing 7 responses)
J
Wednesday 1 July, 2009 at 11:30am

ADAM JOHNSON ASHLEY YOUNG AND BEFITEMBI GOMIS OR JEAN-PIERRE GIGNAC WOULD COS ABOUT 45 MILL ALL TOGETHER
MUUCH BETTER THAN SPENDIN 50 ON RIBERY OR PATO ALONE

J
Wednesday 1 July, 2009 at 11:31am

ANS SESSEGNON

Sam
Wednesday 1 July, 2009 at 1:10pm

We have too many midfielders. I’m surprised we kept ballack! He not good enough. We need one more true center forward. Abonglahor would be nice. English and talented. We do not need maicon! Bosingwa was the best right back last season. Hands down. Turnball as cechs deputy makes sense. Lets give our youngsters a chance this time round!

Anonymous
Wednesday 1 July, 2009 at 3:13pm

robben

Sam
Wednesday 1 July, 2009 at 3:32pm

Injury prone

andres
Wednesday 1 July, 2009 at 6:50pm

why isn´t lavezzi on that list is every person of the chelsea fc staff blind.. LAVEZZI IS A WORLD CLASS PLAYER HE´S 24 AND IT WILL COST 30-35 MILLIONS and is the perfect striker for epl and chelsea he´s fast and strong.

sing him is THE BEST DESICION

niall
Saturday 4 July, 2009 at 5:17pm

hey everybody put franck ribery down for your vote because he is in the top three best players in the world
or maicon or other but mainly ribery thnx




Important: Any comments which contain foul language, or which are of an aggressive or abusive nature will be moderated or removed. Opinions expressed in comments on this website are those of the individual and do not represent the views of The Sport Review.