FOOTBALL: Mark Hughes confirmed as new Fulham manager after signing two-year contract

‘Home-grown’ rule affecting English football

By Kieran Beckles  
6:47pm UK, Sunday July 12, 2009
By Kieran Beckles, 6:47pm UK, Sunday July 12, 2009
Arsenals Cesc Fabregas would count as a home-grown player

Arsenal's Cesc Fabregas would count as a 'home-grown' player under the ruling

English right-back Glen Johnson switches to Liverpool. The injury prone Michael Owen joins Manchester United. Chelsea sign the highly-rated Daniel Sturridge.

The common theme? Three of England’s biggest clubs opting to sign British talent this summer, as opposed to buying young starlets from abroad. A knee jerk reaction to the ‘home-grown rule’ which will be introduced in time for season 2010-11?

Over the last couple of years, the poaching of highly-rated youngsters from youth academies abroad has infuriated UEFA bosses. Examples of this can be seen in the three clubs named above: Daniel Pacheco from Barcelona’s youth team, Federico Macheda from Lazio and Miroslav Stoch from FC Nitra.

This system of purchasing 16 and 17-year-olds from abroad has undoubtedly affected the fortunes of the national team. Home-grown talent now has to compete with prodigies from abroad. It is also unfair on the clubs who nurture potential stars from an early age, only to see the fruits of their labour wasted as big British clubs lure them to England.

Barcelona are an example of a club that has suffered the loss of many talented young footballers to the hands of English football. The most obvious example is Cesc Fabregas at Arsenal. The Gunners captain is now one of Europe’s best talents but was poached from the Barcelona youth system at the tender age of 15.

Fabregas along with Gerard Pique, Daniel Pacheco, and Fran Merida have all been ‘robbed’ from the Catalan giants at an early age. However this trend may be coming to an end with the new home-grown rule set to influence the purchasing strategy of the big clubs.

On May 12, 2009, Richard Scudamore, the Premier League chief executive, announced that the majority of clubs in the league had voted for the implementation of home-grown quotas come the start of the 2010-11 season.

This means that clubs would need a specified number of home-grown players in their squad. It would be similar to the current UEFA regulation where clubs must have at least four players trained by their clubs for three years, and at least an additional four players trained in the club’s home country for the same period in order to able participate in the Champions League or Europa League.

The plans for a quota within European football was first proposed by former UEFA boss Lennart Johansson in 2005. The idea grew from the federation’s frustrations at English clubs fielding overseas players in their teams. At the time, English clubs fiercely opposed the idea, but it has gradually been phased in.

FIFA president Sepp Blatter has suggested a 6+5 system where for every five international players there would need to be six domestic-based players. This was widely rejected by the football community. It was deemed to contravene European legislation on the free movement of people.

Indeed EU laws prevent clubs from choosing players on the basis of nationality. Hence, when UEFA uses the term ‘home-grown’, it refers to players who have trained at the club for at least a 3-year-period between the ages of 16 and 21.

The adaption of the quotas for the Premier League in 2010-11 now reflects how the stance of English clubs has changed. Compared to rivals in Europe like Italy and Spain, it has to be said England aren’t producing the same quantity of quality youngsters.

This new quota will hopefully encourage clubs to trust in British youngsters being developed in their youth systems. Scudamore argues that since the formation of the Premier League in 1992, England haven’t performed badly on the international stage.

Indeed in last season’s campaign, a total of 531 players were used. Out of these 203 were English (38%). Maybe not as bleak a ratio as some pessimists may suggest and the quota would undoubtedly help to increase this ratio.

Yet, there is the other view that it could actually worsen the already growing trend of snatching youngsters from abroad. The only difference being that clubs would lure players at an even younger age to their youth academies in England.

Download The Sport Review's free new iPhone App here
RELATED ARTICLES
HAVE YOUR SAY — 9 Comments
  1. John smith on July 12th, 2009 at 7:18pm

    By the time the home grown rule comes in to effect Michael Owen would have hung up his boots.

    Whoever wrote the article is obviously just churning out s**t for the sake of it, first saying poaching of foreign youngsters will stop, then saying it could actually get worst.

  2. Shane on July 12th, 2009 at 7:51pm

    Owen has signed a two year deal with Man Utd so he will still be playing when it comes into effect.

  3. Bruno on July 12th, 2009 at 8:07pm

    “Whoever wrote the article is obviously just churning out s**t for the sake of it”
    That is such a bitchy thing to say. I think this article is fabulous with a capital F

  4. kidder on July 12th, 2009 at 10:14pm

    Will EUFA allow Real to be the exception from the home grown rule?They don’t steal all the young talent!They steal all the superstar talent with financing from the Spanish government!

  5. Luntz Yes on July 12th, 2009 at 11:44pm

    Mr.Smith, youve taken this too far,out of reach almost. Don’t drag the comments down to your level of hatred. That is such a small thing to say. fabulous with a capital F for funky.

  6. Jack on July 13th, 2009 at 1:26am

    Home grown rule in this case will indeed make teams getting younger players from abroad, to grow them in house. EU laws won’t change so 6+5 is not coming, soon at least. Teams like Real Madrid, (or Inter, AC Milan etc with shortage of new crop Italian players) may have more problems than EPL buying ready made stars. I am a gunner and I am sure we will have 4 to 6 players who’r either Brits or Arsenal academy graduates coming to the first team soon. It will be interesting…

  7. venu on July 13th, 2009 at 6:05am

    Considering the EU restrictions i think the 6+5 is a no go. The quota has nothing to do with english team at all. The players who don’t play in the big four always get more chances to play and the good ones will play no matter what the cheaper options are!
    Apart from the dearth of strikers I do not see a problem with the national team.

  8. Danny Salford Red on July 13th, 2009 at 9:06am

    6 plus 5 will never happen. Current leglislation allows any member of a European country to work anywhere in Europe and to try and restrict this is illegal for a start.

  9. Andy Smith on July 20th, 2009 at 9:39pm

    if clubs in europe consider it to be “poaching,” then start offering contracts at an earlier age. when parents put in a lot of money towards their child in football, sometimes they need to make money off of it for the sake of the family. machedas family was possibly deep below the poverty line but man utd came in.




Important: Any comments which contain foul language, or which are of an aggressive or abusive nature will be moderated or removed. Opinions expressed in comments on this website are those of the individual and do not represent the views of thesportreview.com.
The Sport Review - Sports News and Opinion
RSS Feed Facebook Twitter via Email