FOOTBALL: Stuart Pearce confirmed as manager for England's friendly against Netherlands on 29 February

Rivalry burns on for Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras

By Online Editorial   

It was embarrassing to witness two former stars indulging in a childish spat at a charity event, says Simon Mundie. Fortunately, genuine warmth exists between today’s fiercest rivals.

It made for pretty uncomfortable viewing when Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras faced each other on a tennis court last week, for the first time since their US Open final of 2002. It was at the ‘Hit for Haiti’ event in Indian Wells; the aim being to raise cash for victims of the earthquake which devastated the country earlier this year.

The cast list was incredible, including the likes of Martina Navratilova and Steffi Graf, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal and those two great rivals of the 90s, Sampras and Agassi. They were all mic’d up, and the good natured banter was flowing.

That is, until the animosity that Agassi and Sampras feel for each other spilled over. It all started when Sampras decided to mimic Agassi’s famous pigeon-toed walk. The crowd lapped it up, and it looked like Agassi was tickled too, until he retorted by accusing Pete of being a stingy tipper, something he famously touched on in his fantastic autobiography Open. Then Pete nearly decapitated Agassi with a wild first serve. He also accused him of ‘getting personal’, to which Agassi replied, “No, everyone knows it already Pete.”

The crowd went eerily silent, as if they didn’t know where to look. And then there were the other two players on court, Federer and Nadal, the duo who inherited the mantle of the games greatest rivalry. They both sensed the uneasy atmosphere, Federer joking, “This rivalry is intense, man” during a pause, “I mean, Rafa, start. Do something!”

Nadal later pleaded ignorance of the whole incident, conveniently blaming the language barrier. The whole spat has been widely criticised in the media, with many people accusing the American pair of casting a shadow over a charity event by letting their egos get in the way.

Agassi and Sampras were always very different characters. Agassi burst on to the tennis scene in dramatic fashion in the late 80s as a brash showman, while Sampras seemed uneasy with all the attention that accompanied his US Open win of 1990.

That set the pattern for the remainder of their careers, with Agassi creating as many column inches in the press for his off court antics, while Pete was more than happy for his racket to do the talking, without ever truly shaking off accusations that he was boring. Their contrasting personalities added flavour to their rivalry in much the same way as their on-court styles. Agassi summed it all up perfectly when he said, “I think both of our worst nightmares would be to wake up the next morning and be the other.”

There have been other tennis rivalries over the years which have featured players who couldn’t stand each other as people, none more so than Jimmy Connors and John McEnroe, who nearly came to blows on a couple of occasions. But it is extremely rare for players to reveal the full extent of their mutual antipathy once their careers have finished.

The Agassi-Sampras episode contrasts unfavourably with Roger and Rafa, two champions who exude class and mutual respect. It is inconceivable that they would engage in such a spat; indeed their relationship has been punctuated with moments of genuine warmth. When Federer broke down in tears after losing the 2009 Australian Open final, Nadal took time out from his own celebrations to console him.

Nadal and Federer seem to cherish each other and the part they have played in their respective careers. Admittedly it wasn’t always like that, with Federer initially regarding Nadal as an upstart, but he ultimately recognised the Spaniard’s brilliance, particularly after their epic Wimbledon final of 2008.

If anything, the Indian Wells incident will enhance the Federer-Nadal rivalry. To have two players in the same era that are so competitive with each other, yet have seemed to remain friends throughout speaks volumes. It is a shame that Sampras and Agassi had to sully their own rivalry with the unsavoury exchanges of last week that no one could have predicted.

There was one thing that was unsurprising about this soon to be infamous match though. Sampras found a way to win, just as he did during so many of their epic tussles while their personal animosities weren’t being so publicly aired.

Reproduced with permission from betting.betfair.com. © The Sporting Exchange Limited

Related Articles
Your Comments (showing 5 responses)
cc
Sunday 21 March, 2010 at 5:20pm

awsome

Sunday 21 March, 2010 at 7:08pm

Brilliant stuff.

Gerry
Monday 22 March, 2010 at 1:56pm

It was a charity match and it does raise alot of money and it was not about the winning which we all know is the only thing on PS’s mind. He cannot play a single match without well – aiming a ball at the head of a man he cannot accept will always be more popular than he even though he has not won as many GS events as he did. Sometimes it is more about the person than the actual event and it was always all ANDRE all the time. PS could never match him in popularity thus he has to win at any and all costs.

CSM
Saturday 27 March, 2010 at 11:44am

Whatever you may say about PS, it was Andre who started the petty bickering. It is there for all the world to see … compelling him to apologise publicly the next day. What he did on that court and what he did in his autobiography reflect the type of player he has always been – uncontrolled. It is this sort of renegade behaviour which some members of the pubblic seem to enjoy – because it is not “boring”.

gary
Wednesday 31 March, 2010 at 6:46am

Andre was lucky it was just Pete. Had it been the others which he also attacked at his book like Courier, Becker etc., it would have been a brawl. Courier is not one to shy away from things like this, he’s a thug too, much more in growing up than andre. the attacks by andre to pete was less hurtful than the attacks he made against the others coz he (andre) called them us unlikeables and “i hate them’s” stuff.




Important: Any comments which contain foul language, or which are of an aggressive or abusive nature will be moderated or removed. Opinions expressed in comments on this website are those of the individual and do not represent the views of The Sport Review.