
Teams were warned about the Jabulani ball, says Adidas

Adidas says it distributed the balls to teams back in February
Adidas, the manufacturer of the World Cup football which has caused much controversy in South Africa, says it warned teams that it “takes some getting used to”.
“We presented the technology and underlined the requirement to get used to it because it is a different ball and a different technology,” said Adidas spokesman Thomas Schaikvan.
“There are players who play in leagues with other balls, there are players who have not played in the Africa Cup of Nations, and players from other federations who have not practised with the ball. ”
“These are the players who take the most amount of time to get used to it.”
England manager Fabio Capello has slammed the Jabulani ball, calling it the “worst he has seen” and has ensured his team begin each training session with long-range passing practice in order to adapt it.
“This is the worst ball that I have seen in my life,” said the England coach. “It is terrible for the goalkeepers because it is impossible to follow the trajectory.”
“It is difficult to control long passesâ€â€players miss 80% of them.”
Despite having distributed the balls to the various football federations back in February, sponsorship agreementsâ€â€such as England’s with Umbroâ€â€have prevented most teams from using the Jabulani in the build-up to the tournament.
England have been training with the Jabulani for four weeks and only used it in one warm-up match against Japan.
Only Adidas-sponsored teams including Germany, Argentina and France used the ball extensively before the tournament.
Nike are the official ball supplier of the English, Italian and Spanish top flights, but Adidas maintain that the Jabulani was tested in the German Bundesliga as well as the Africa Cup of Nations in January.
Adidas have, however, admitted that the altitude at which many of the matches in South Africa are taking place may be partly to blame for its unpredictable nature.
What a load of balls! (Sorry had to get that in there.)
It might be new technology, the roundest ever, and played at altitude, but there was nothing much stopping England from using the ball in training camps over the last few months.
A deal might have been in place with Umbro, but I’m sure Umbro would prefer England to succeed at the world cup by getting practice with the tournament ball, than hold them to contract and have them go out in the last 16.
That much is true of every nation. It’s not like the ball hasn’t been available. I think it’s great we have a ball with a bit of unpredictability. Ensures players have to focus more, and be even more perfect in their play to succeed with it.
Gareth I agree with you that the teams should have practiced with the ball more, however I think a better ball should have been selected for the World Cup. I mean couldn’t they have picked one that has been proven to perform like the Nike T90 Ascente Football? I have used a lot of different balls and that is the most consistent and best ball that I have found.
But with Adidas as a long-time partner of the world cup, there was never a chance of using the T90 Ascente, even if it is used by the EPL, La Liga and Serie A.
I’ve played 3 matches wit htis ball, and it’s garbage! Too light, too lively, it’s like hitting a beach ball, there is no weight in it! Total garbage FIFA and Adidas need to admit its a failure and bring in the champions league ball for the rest of the cup, it’s a million times better!!
I agree. Robbert Green might have got to save that ball in the first match against america if they were using a better ball.
neil, the football is no lighter than any other. To pass the fifa regulations it had to be between certain weights so stop talking rubbish!
i don’t feel very strongly about the football as i a loser at playing sports thanks guys
















