
Hero or villain? The Luis Suárez debate continues


Luis Suárez’s cynical handball in the dying seconds of extra time prevented Ghana from becoming Africa’s first ever World Cup semi-finalists.
The Uruguayan striker quite rightly received a straight red card for his display of volleyball technique in preventing the African side from clinching a last-minute winner.
However, Asamoah Gyan’s subsequent penalty miss kept Uruguay in the match and posed an interesting moral question surrounding Suárez’s actions.
Normally one tries to keep sport, politics and morality as separate and distinct as possible, but on occasions such as this it becomes increasingly difficult.
Some have seen Suárez’s handball as a gamble that ultimately paid off as his side went on to book their place in the last four of the competition.
Others have labelled him as a cheat and drawn comparisons with Maradona’s infamous Hand of God in 1986.
So, on which side should the average neutral viewer fall? Was it a clever gamble or a blatant act of cheating?
Imagine if that was the World Cup final between England and, say, Germany, and the scores are level going into the dying seconds of extra time.
Bastian Schweinsteiger is tripped by Frank Lampard about 10 yards outside the England penalty area, giving Germany one last chance to threaten.
Mesut Özil curls over a free kick, which is met by the head of Miroslav Klose. The ball is destined for the back of the net, until Wayne Rooney intervenes and punches the ball off the line.
Rooney is red-carded and Germany have a penalty, which Klose blazes over the cross bar with the last kick of the game.
England go on to win the match on penalties. Would you really care that England had won in such a manner?
Reading many of the comments from readers on a variety of websites gives the impression that most people would not care if England won the World Cup in such a manner.
But, those same people are bemoaning Suárez for cheating. It simply does not add up.
Does it come down to the fact that football fans are ultimately hypocritical and clamber up onto the moral high ground at every opportunity?
Sadly, it probably is true.
He is the worst!
He constantly dives and expects free kicks/penalties.
They didn’t deserve to win!
You can argue that he’s the worst but if Uruguay go on to win the world cup he’ll be a national hero.
To be honest ya it was a shockin handball but as the article says if Rooney did it there wouldn’t be half as much fuss.
In the end he got a red card and there was a spot kick given and it was missed, not saved but missed.
So I think he was right to do it
I don’t think many nations would care much if they achieved victory in this manner.
The sense of injustice could come if the player who handled wasn’t sent off or a penalty wasn’t given.
The referee here had a good view, but there was a player in just ahead and to the side of Suarez. If the referee hadn’t seen clearly he may have “seen” it has the other player heading the ball, and not awarded anything.
Gyan had a chance to send Ghana through and missed, he’ll regret that for the rest of his life now.
All this talk of Suarez, and it’ll surely continue into next week with the Germany game, is futile.
I think only goodie two shoes Gary Lineker wouldn’t have intervened in that manner. Anyone else would have reacted the way Suarez did. Huge gamble, but it paid off.
Onwards and upwards.
Suárez was right, was the only option he had to prevent the goal from Ghana.
Uruguay was fortunate then that the ball hits the crossbar.
Football is a game and Suárez was punished for breaking the rules of the game but that has nothing to do with immorality.
The 1966 World Cup in England has gone down in history for the shameful pictures of a final that was clearly ready for the win the British. A phantom goal clearly was not, and a goal when the field was physically invaded by fans, a world shame!
I wouldn’t call this cheating at all. Football/Soccer is a chess game. Who can move the peaces and out smart their opponent. In this case Suárez out smarted everyone because he thought of something that no one else thought of. He used the rules to give his team a chance and should not be called a cheater. I’m not a Uruguay fan at all but I think he did the right thing for his team.
If you want to talk about cheaters and fakers look at the Italian team. Their players were the best actors in the world cup. FIFA should have given them an Oscar for some of the fouls they got away with. They even got a penalty for one of them and they still didn’t win LOL.
Germany all the way!!!
I bet any player would have stopped the ball from going into the goal with his hands at the last minutes of extra time for his country. Ok by the rules he did deserve the sending off and the penalty against urugauy but its not like he got away with it! Ghana fans are all blaming suarez but they should be blaming gyan for missing the penalty. ghana had a red card in their favour and a penalty, what more could they want?!!!? honestly gyan should have finished the game by putting the ball at the back of the net…… but he didn’t. i fully support uruguay and suarez and they did deserve to win.
















